I've been buzzing about this thing for about a week now. Touch Graph is an application for Facebook that shows you how your friends are connected and interconnected visually. I know, I know, another Facebook app, blah blah blah. But this one is seriously cool and kind of useful. At least for me.
Awhile back, Lilly and I had this idea to create a Friend Web that you could carry around with you. It shows who your friends are, how they're connected, and what friend grouping they're in. It cuts down a lot on the "wait, who are we talking about again?" It was also a great idea for parents to know exactly who their kids' friends were. Well, Facebook neatly solved this problem because if you have an Internet capable computer/friend, you could just show people online. But, even then, the missing ingredient was a visual depiction of your friends and how they were related. Hello Touch Graph! We've been waiting for you!
Here's how Touch Graph works. By leveraging the connections that are already embedded in your Facebook information, the program comes up with a giant relational web of your friends. Those who have lots of connections to you and other people in your web are closer to the center. Those with fewer connections are further. Simple right? Keep in mind this doesn't mean those closer to you are your "better" friends, it just shows connectivity.
When you make your friend graph, you can adjust the settings to show however many friends you want. I'd suggest cranking it as high as possible for the best view. I tried smaller sample sizes but it wasn't as interesting. So once you crank your selection pool to the max, all of your friends are ranked, generally in order of how many connections they have to your other friends. But higher ranks are given to friends who are connectors between different cliques. They call this "Betweenness Centrality," which is a metric to measure a person's importance within a social network. Here's a cool article and explanation about that here.
So what's a clique? Different colors are used to show clusters and cliques. All your friends in a particular color are probably friends with each other, but not connected to other people outside of that group. It's really accurate and works quite well. I mean, the colors definitely showed my various cliques of friends, people who were "one-offs (unconnected to anybody except me)," and revealed all sorts of interesting information. You can also choose to organize your friend web by location, thus finding out how many people are in San Diego or New York, for example.
When you switch to pyramid view, it shows you by semi-tiers who's the most important people in your social network. Like who's connected to the most people, or who's the gateway friend for your other friends. This is freaking fascinating isn't it? It's probably not anything you didn't already know about your own friends, but for someone else to look at your graph, it really gives them an idea of your social worlds.
I'm just happy I finally found a good personal use for Facebook. All this time I've been doing it because everyone else in the world does it, but all those hours wasted on it has been repaid by the wonder that is Touch Graph.
What I'd like to see is someone's graph with two or three large dominant cliques. I tend to want to mix as many of my friends together as possible and I really only have one big group of all muxed up friends. When I visit you next, I want to see your Friend Web, thanks. For my settings under "Advanced" I used: Min User Photo (1), Min Edge Photo (0), and Min Network User (5)
While I'm at it. This other Facebook app is interesting too. It's called Socialistics and digs up demographic dirt on your friends in graph format. It's still got a lot of work needed but I was able to find out, for example, that 42% of my (Facebook) friends are married, 14% are engaged, 20% in a relationship, and 21% single. Also, only 11% of my friends are my age, with 56% of my friends being 26-28 years old. Once this thing can tell me how many friends younger than me are married/engaged, then I'll really know how far behind I am. Can't wait!
50 books. 50 movies. 1 you.
Join me for the challenge to end all challenges: fiftyfifty.me. 50 books and 50 movies in one year. We can do it together! But you know, separately.
Mine, Mine, Mine
Sometimes I write books, read all about them here and then maybe pick one up? They make great wall decorations, posters, and items to marvel at in the event of a conversation emergency!
Super Important Stuff
- The Game of Publishing
- Public Relations: Friends Edition
- Social Network Farmers
- Everyone Else and You
- Author AD&D Character Sheets
- Wedding Plus Zeros
- Twitter: What Kind of Bird Are You?
- RSS For Your OCD
- Friend Rivalries
- Consider the Seating Chart
- Winter Boo / Dating Resumes
- Throwback Thursday: Bunnicula
- Dance Movie Reviews
- Friendship Archetype Hierarchy
Blog Archive
-
►
2019
(5)
- ► December 2019 (1)
- ► April 2019 (1)
- ► March 2019 (1)
- ► February 2019 (1)
-
►
2018
(4)
- ► December 2018 (1)
- ► August 2018 (1)
- ► January 2018 (1)
-
►
2017
(8)
- ► December 2017 (2)
- ► March 2017 (2)
- ► January 2017 (2)
-
►
2016
(22)
- ► December 2016 (1)
- ► November 2016 (1)
- ► September 2016 (2)
- ► April 2016 (2)
- ► March 2016 (2)
- ► February 2016 (2)
- ► January 2016 (2)
-
►
2015
(22)
- ► December 2015 (2)
- ► November 2015 (1)
- ► October 2015 (2)
- ► September 2015 (2)
- ► August 2015 (1)
- ► April 2015 (4)
- ► March 2015 (3)
- ► January 2015 (1)
-
►
2014
(23)
- ► December 2014 (2)
- ► November 2014 (2)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (4)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (2)
- ► March 2014 (1)
- ► February 2014 (3)
- ► January 2014 (1)
-
►
2013
(35)
- ► December 2013 (1)
- ► November 2013 (3)
- ► October 2013 (2)
- ► September 2013 (2)
- ► August 2013 (1)
- ► April 2013 (3)
- ► March 2013 (5)
- ► February 2013 (3)
- ► January 2013 (4)
-
►
2012
(61)
- ► December 2012 (3)
- ► November 2012 (3)
- ► October 2012 (3)
- ► September 2012 (3)
- ► August 2012 (6)
- ► April 2012 (6)
- ► March 2012 (5)
- ► February 2012 (8)
- ► January 2012 (7)
-
►
2011
(91)
- ► December 2011 (8)
- ► November 2011 (5)
- ► October 2011 (8)
- ► September 2011 (7)
- ► August 2011 (8)
- ► April 2011 (10)
- ► March 2011 (5)
- ► February 2011 (9)
- ► January 2011 (8)
-
►
2010
(105)
- ► December 2010 (9)
- ► November 2010 (7)
- ► October 2010 (11)
- ► September 2010 (8)
- ► August 2010 (10)
- ► April 2010 (8)
- ► March 2010 (5)
- ► February 2010 (13)
- ► January 2010 (8)
-
▼
2009
(140)
- ► December 2009 (12)
- ► November 2009 (14)
- ► October 2009 (7)
- ► September 2009 (12)
- ► August 2009 (12)
- ► April 2009 (10)
- ▼ March 2009 (11)
- ► February 2009 (10)
- ► January 2009 (11)
-
►
2008
(130)
- ► December 2008 (14)
- ► November 2008 (8)
- ► October 2008 (15)
- ► September 2008 (11)
- ► August 2008 (6)
- ► April 2008 (14)
- ► March 2008 (9)
- ► February 2008 (7)
- ► January 2008 (12)
-
►
2007
(81)
- ► December 2007 (8)
- ► November 2007 (7)
- ► October 2007 (6)
- ► September 2007 (6)
- ► August 2007 (5)
- ► April 2007 (6)
- ► March 2007 (10)
- ► February 2007 (13)
- ► January 2007 (1)
-
►
2005
(2)
- ► September 2005 (2)
Labels
Movies
(222)
Books
(121)
Listening to
(103)
Life
(85)
Technology
(67)
Entertainment
(46)
Music
(46)
Sports
(37)
Stuff Reading
(37)
Currently pushing
(33)
Writing
(33)
Celtics
(29)
Chloe
(28)
50/50
(25)
Quotes
(24)
Relationships
(23)
Dance
(22)
New York
(22)
Television
(22)
Reading
(20)
Games
(19)
Five
(18)
Taiwan
(18)
Video Games
(13)
Blog
(12)
Debs
(10)
Authors
(9)
Awesome
(9)
Best
(9)
Food
(9)
Friendship
(9)
Comics
(8)
YA
(8)
Asian
(7)
Mixtapes
(7)
Fashion
(6)
San Francisco
(6)
Art
(5)
Animals
(4)
Redesign
(3)
Travel
(3)
Site Info
(2)
Contact
I'm available for television appearances, library talks, relationship advice, general counseling, and all-expenses paid trips to Morocco. If you have questions, concerns, or rants, you can reach me at digitaljon(at)gmail.com